Anil Deshmukh corruption case: HC dismisses bail pleas of CBI official, lawyer

The Delhi High Court has dismissed bail pleas of CBI official Abhishek Tiwari and an advocate who were arrested in connection with an alleged leak of the probe agencys preliminary inquiry report in a corruption case against former Maharashtra home minister Anil DeshmukhThe high court said it was not inclined to grant the relief as the investigation is at its initial stage It said it is settled law that the court has to keep in mind not only the nature of accusations but also if there exists reasonable apprehension of the evidence being tampered with the bail may be refusedThe allegation in the present FIR is rather based on tampering of the evidence thus considering the initial stage of the investigation I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners herein at this stage The petitions stands dismissed Justice Yogesh Khanna said The court passed a common order on the bail pleas of Tiwari and Nagpurbased advocate Anand Dilip DagaThe Central Bureau of Investigation had registered a case against its subinspector Tiwari advocate Daga who was working as a lawyer for Deshmukh and others on various allegations including illegal gratification Daga was arrested for allegedly trying to subvert the Bombay High Courtdirected preliminary enquiry against DeshmukhThe counsel for the two accused submitted that only four days remand was given to the CBI and thereafter the trial court had refused further remand and that the two men are in custody for 40 days and the agency did not even file an application for interviewing them hence are not required for further investigation and they be granted bailThe CBI however opposed the bail pleas saying the offences committed by the two men are serious in nature and no investigation can proceed if the lawyer of the accused and the investigating officer join hands to benefit someone The CBI said the allegations are serious and release of the accused may become detrimental to a fair investigationThe investigation is still at its initial stage and the accused may influence the investigation and tamper with the evidence and shall stall the proceedings if allowed to be released on bail at this stage it said Tiwari and Daga had challenged the trial courts order rejecting their bail pleas A report of the preliminary enquiry PE purportedly giving clean chit to Deshmukh was leaked earlier causing embarrassment to the agencyThe CBI started a probe into the leakage in which it emerged that findings of the PE were influenced Attempts by Anil Deshmukhs team were in contempt of the Bombay High Court which had directed that all concerned should fully cooperate with the CBI while conducting the PE In this case it has appeared that Deshmukhs team tried to subvert the PE the CBI had saidThe CBI had started a PE on the orders of the Bombay High Court which had issued the direction while hearing a public interest litigation on allegations of corruption against Deshmukh In the FIR the CBI had booked Deshmukh and others unidentified under Indian Penal Code sections related to criminal conspiracy and sections of the Prevention of Corruption Act for attempt to obtain undue advantage for improper and dishonest performance of public dutyAlso Read CBI chief Subodh Jaiswal is potential accused in case against Anil Deshmukh Maharashtra govt to Bombay HCAllegations against Deshmukh had surfaced after the removal of Mumbai Police Commissioner Param Bir Singh He was removed after the alleged role of policeman Sachin Waze surfaced in the case of an explosiveladen SUV which was found parked outside the residence of industrialist Mukesh Ambani Waze was arrested by the National Investigation Agency NIAThe FIR alleged that Deshmukh and others exercised undue influence over the transfer and posting of officialsThis story has been sourced from a third party syndicated feed agencies Midday accepts no responsibility or liability for its dependability trustworthiness reliability and data of the text Midday managementmiddaycom reserves the sole right to alter delete or remove without notice the content in its absolute discretion for any reason whatsoever